|
Click to Play song  9/11 was definitly sn inside job that made some people a whole lot of money.Amoungst the most notibles accourding to renowned researcher "Alex Jones" of infowars.com was the Bin Ladins, the Bush gang, the Rumsfelts,Dick Cheney, Colon Powel,l in fact just about anyone in the administration you can think of made a killing out of the cold blooded murder of over 1 million civillians in Iraq alone, though thier iinvestmentsin the defense contracting industries. Halliburton for instance has enjoyed a 3000% increase in share values since it's former CEO " Dick Cheney took office. Note he was never democratially elected ,nor was G.W Bush, they just took office basically unopposed by the actual winners of which Al Gore was one, which is a pretty good reson not to trust him ,but more on Gore on another page. [ see " Convienient Omissions" ] The fact alone that all onsite witnesses claimed that the second jet was not a civikian aircraft should have turned it into an open and shut case , let alone the rest of the mountain of evidence against the mobsters that have highjacked the U.S government . The television footage of the attacks seen by millions over and over was taped by thousands and replays at slow motion reveal the chilling reality that the U.S airforce was used to kill Americans in the country's most muticultural and socialy progressive city Testimonies from W.T.C staff and firemen about explosions moments before the planes struck reaks of controlled demolition accourding to controlled demolition experts the world over At this point it is also pertinant to mention Afghanistan the forgotten country , that had nothing to do with any of it. For centuries now foriegn powers have made this country a battkeground and we must hold our heads in shame for our part in the latest wave of destuction waged in this dirt poor nation, for an offense that the people of this country had no part in whatsoever. Bin Ladin is a Saudi, so why not invade Saudi Arabia? It's obvious, they sell thier oil cheap for Amercan $ and all the right people have investments there perhaps?
London 7/7 Another inside job.
Ci bono, the Latin legal term for who had the most to gain. I'm sorry to any biggots out there, but it certainly wasn't the muslims.Riding the tide of unprecedented empathy, due to the hidious slaughter in both Afghanistan & Iraq, with 90%+ of British people polled indicating that they were against their country's involvement in the unprovoked murder & theft.The muslim community was probably the safest it had ever been in merry old England. After the attacks it was no longer, their world was turned upside down. It's not as if the alleged bombers were stupid ,incase that crossed your mind, One was a teacher, two were university students, the other just took delivery of a new Mercedes Benz. They all purchased return tickets. One of the bombers I.D was found at 2 locations.That is very significant, because it indicates a conspiracy to implicate, & the unquestionable involvement of a 3rd party with the technology to produce or reproduce official identification documents. Now I wonder whom that could be, other muslims perhaps? Ci bono ? I think not. The alleged telephone call to Aariel Sharon by his security staff that morning 20 minutes before the first blast, not to go out,[ he was in London at the time, in a hotel, near one of the tube stations that was attacked], means Mosad knew something. The fact that the number 30 bus was ordered to be parked, off route with no explanation, out of the 10,000 odd buses running around London that day, just before it blew up means the police, or elements therein knew something about it also.
Reports of 3 undetinated devices found by French investigators, the first internationals on the scene, that revealed high tech plastic explosives of Chinese origin, the serial numbers of which traced the sale back to a consigner in Isreal. a curious coincedence perhaps, but in these days of media justice, one would think both Mosad & the Met would have a case to answer let alone the rest of the evidence that has emerged against the " 4 good lads gone radical extremist theory ".
At the last popularity poll taken before the attacks Tony Blair's approval rating was down to an alltime low of just 28% & falling.
He needed to justify involvement in murder & theft , break the unity of the resolve , with 90% of the British people against the war, his party would loose government at the next election , guaranteed. The attacks, carried out with military precission , by 4 ammateurs with backpacks is too hard to swallow even for the gullibles , let alone the fact that the exact same scenario, at exact same locations , at the exact same time, was a blueprint for a similtanious mock anti-terrorist operation by government agencies. The other anomally in the backpacker theory is the claim by tube attack survivors that the explosion came through the floor. The early reports claimed that high tech plastic explosives were used , these were soon downgraded to jar bombs full of nails. I'm no expert but it's difficult to imagine a homemade jar bomb doing that to a train. Besides why would the victims lie about something like that? There was absolutely nothing to gain. The government on the otherhand had every thing to loose if the story wasn't debunked.
The whole illusion was an inside job. Tony Blair should be tried for mass murder & treason as quickly as the U.K military was thrust in to protect private investments in Basra ,at the taxpayers expense. The list of evidence of government complicity grows by the day, whilst the list of evidence against the accused is but a fast deminishing mottled collection , of obviously planted material that would not be admissible in court. Ci bono ?
|
